North Coast CO-OP Community Kitchens Class and Workshop Schedule

 

New Newsflash Former Local Congressman Don Clausen Dies at 91 For Humboldt County

Don Clausen, who was born in Ferndale and served in the U.S. House of Representatives from 1963 to 1982, died over the weekend. He was 91. The County of Humboldt will fly the U.S. flag at half-staff in Clausen’s honor.

February 09, 2015

Former Local Congressman Don Clausen Dies at 91

Alert PhotoDon Clausen, who was born in Ferndale and served in the U.S. House of Representatives from 1963 to 1982, died over the weekend. He was 91. The County of Humboldt…… Read on

Al Frankin U.S. Senator Minnesota

Al Franken - U.S. Senator, Minnesota

Al Frankin U.S. Senator Minnesota

Dear Ralph,

You’ve heard me talk about net neutrality — the idea that all online data has to be treated equally by Internet service providers (ISPs). Hopefullytomorrow, you’ll hear the President talk about it in his State of the Union address.

Net neutrality is one of the founding principles of the Internet, and it’s allowed small companies with big ideas to compete against more established firms.

All of those companies — from Google on down to the mom-and-pop store up the street — have to choose from among the same small pool of ISPs. And if net neutrality goes down, those ISPs are going to have enormous influence over what you can see and do online.

We’ve been working for a long time to preserve net neutrality — and we’ve succeeded in bringing net neutrality to national attention. Net neutrality is the foremost First Amendment issue of our time, and the FCC is expected to vote on its future soon. Join me in this last push — tell the FCC to protect net neutrality and promote a free and open Internet.

No matter where you’ll be tomorrow night, I hope you’ll be watching the President’s speech, because the opponents of net neutrality definitely will be.

Thanks for sticking with me in the fight for net neutrality.

Al

Thirty-five Democrats abandoned their constituents for Wall St. https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#inbox/14acfa1407c5a550

Thirty-five Democrats abandoned their constituents for Wall St.

Every time a Democrat abandons the Party to shill for corporations at the expense of their constituents, we must let them know we are watching and won’t forget when it comes time for re-election. Click here to sign the petition. 

Keep fighting,
Monique Teal, Daily Kos

P.S. Here are the 35 House Democrats: Brad Ashford (NE-02), Ami Bera (CA-07), Don Beyer (VA-08), Sanford Bishop (GA-02), Julia Brownley (CA-26), Cheri Bustos (IL-17), John Carney (DE-AL), Gerry Connolly (VA-11), Henry Cuellar (TX-28), John Delaney (MD-06), Suzan DelBene (WA-01), Elizabeth Esty (CT-05), Bill Foster (IL-11), John Garamendi (CA-03), Gwen Graham (FL-02), Jim Himes (CT-04), Hank Johnson (GA-04), Derek Kilmer (WA-06), Ron Kind (WI-03), Rick Larsen (WA-02), Dan Lipinski (IL-03), David Loebsack (IA-02), Sean Maloney (NY-18), Patrick Murphy (FL-18), Scott Peters (CA-52), Collin Peterson (MN-07), Jared Polis (CO-02), Mike Quigley (IL-05), Raul Ruiz (CA-36), Bobby Rush (IL-01), Kurt Schrader (OR-05), David Scott (GA-13), Terri Sewell (AL-07), Kyrsten Sinema (AZ-09), Albio Sires (NJ-08).

Title9guy.com, sign the petition denouncing the 35 House Democrats who joined Republicans in trying to gut the Wall Street reform bill that Democrats and Elizabeth Warren worked so hard to pass in 2010.On their second day in session, the House voted on a bill designed to weaken the most important protections of the Wall Street reform bill of 2010.

Thirty-five Democrats voted with Republicans and almost allowed the bill to pass. Fortunately, the bill didn’t meet the necessary two-thirds vote threshold to override President Obama’s expected veto.

Wall Street reform was passed in an attempt to prevent another 2008 financial crisis by lowering risk in various parts of the U.S. financial system. Since its passage, Republicans and Democrats in league with Wall St. have done their best to eliminate its most important protections—and leave the U.S. vulnerable to another economic crisis.

Votes like this are calculated moves on the part of centrist Democrats to please donors and distance themselves from the Democratic Party. This isn’t the first offense for many of these bad actors and we’ll likely see more votes like this over the next two years.

Every time a Democrat abandons the Party to shill for corporations at the expense of their constituents, we must let them know we are watching and won’t forget when it comes time for re-election. Click here to sign the petition. 

Keep fighting,
Monique Teal, Daily Kos

P.S. Here are the 35 House Democrats: Brad Ashford (NE-02), Ami Bera (CA-07), Don Beyer (VA-08), Sanford Bishop (GA-02), Julia Brownley (CA-26), Cheri Bustos (IL-17), John Carney (DE-AL), Gerry Connolly (VA-11), Henry Cuellar (TX-28), John Delaney (MD-06), Suzan DelBene (WA-01), Elizabeth Esty (CT-05), Bill Foster (IL-11), John Garamendi (CA-03), Gwen Graham (FL-02), Jim Himes (CT-04), Hank Johnson (GA-04), Derek Kilmer (WA-06), Ron Kind (WI-03), Rick Larsen (WA-02), Dan Lipinski (IL-03), David Loebsack (IA-02), Sean Maloney (NY-18), Patrick Murphy (FL-18), Scott Peters (CA-52), Collin Peterson (MN-07), Jared Polis (CO-02), Mike Quigley (IL-05), Raul Ruiz (CA-36), Bobby Rush (IL-01), Kurt Schrader (OR-05), David Scott (GA-13), Terri Sewell (AL-07), Kyrsten Sinema (AZ-09), Albio Sires (NJ-08)

DNC HQ to Me and You

Crow Canyon Archaeological Cente

Dec 18 at 12:16 PM

President Elizabeth Warren?

President Elizabeth Warren?

President Elizabeth Warren.

Just imagine, for a moment, the fear those three words strike in the heart of every Wall Street hack in America.

For good reason. This past week we saw Sen. Elizabeth Warren demonstrate why she is such an important leader for our country. She built new momentum to stop the nomination of Antonio Weiss, the unqualified investment banker who has been tapped for an important Treasury Department post. She also led the effort to stop the loopholes in financial regulations that were included in the cromnibus government funding bill.

The cromnibus vote is a perfect example of why we need Sen. Warren to join the presidential race. At a pivotal moment in our country’s history, we need a presidential candidate who can bring Americans together to fight against income inequality and make sure our government is more about working families than Wall Street. That’s why our friends at MoveOn are launching a campaign to draft Elizabeth Warren for president — and why we are asking DFA members to potentially join the draft movement.

DFA’s Executive Director Charles Chamberlain makes the case in the email below. But before we move forward, we need the official approval of DFA members. This decision is now in your hands.

Voting starts now and ends on Tuesday, December 16, at 10am ET. You can cast your official ballot by clicking below: Should DFA launch a major campaign to draft Sen. Warren to run for president?

YES, DFA should draft Elizabeth Warren to run for president.

NO, DFA should not draft her.

– Annie

Annie Weinberg, Electoral Director
Democracy for America

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Charles Chamberlain, Democracy for America
Date: Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 12:14 PM
Subject: VOTE NOW: Should DFA draft Elizabeth Warren for president?

Ralph —

Did you hear the exciting news?

Following the results of Democracy for America’s 2016 Presidential Pulse Poll in November — which showed Sen. Elizabeth Warren taking the top spot by nearly 20 points — our friends at MoveOn just held a membership vote of their own and announced that they will invest at least $1 million in organizing an unprecedented people-powered campaign to draft Elizabeth Warren to run for president.

MoveOn will hire field organizers in early caucus and primary states, like Iowa and New Hampshire, and run a 100% positive campaign that amplifies Warren’s vision for strengthening the middle class and supporting working families. To launch the campaign, MoveOn is releasing an incredible new video telling Sen. Warren’s story — who she is and why she is the right leader for this pivotal moment in our nation’s history (scroll down to watch it).

From the New York Times and Boston Globe to MSNBC and CNN, this news became a game-changing — and potentially historic — day in presidential politics fueled not just by MoveOn’s bold move, but by a potential decision by DFA members as well. As one media outlet wrote:

MoveOn is not the only liberal political group pushing for a Warren run. Democracy for America said Tuesday it would poll its members about joining the “Draft Warren” effort. 

“Washington consultants can spout off a dozen reasons why Elizabeth Warren shouldn’t run, but none of that beltway blather means a thing next to this one, simple truth: The Democratic Party and our country desperately need Warren’s voice in the 2016 presidential debate,” said DFA Executive Director Charles Chamberlain. “Senator Warren has deep grassroots support, an unwavering populist progressive vision, and the fearless fighting spirit needed to win the support of Democrats, independents and Republicans. And that’s why we will ask DFA members to support our plans to join the emerging Draft Warren effort.”

With the movement to draft Elizabeth Warren taking off, DFA members now have an opportunity to make history by officially launching a draft campaign of our own in concert with allies like MoveOn, the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, and grassroots SuperPAC Ready for Warren.But, before we move forward, we need the official approval of DFA members. This decision is now in your hands.

Voting starts now and ends on Tuesday, December 16 at 10am ET. You can cast your official ballot by clicking below: Should DFA launch a major campaign to draft Sen. Warren to run for president?

YES, DFA should draft Elizabeth Warren to run for president.

NO, DFA should not draft her.

(Both voting links above include MoveOn’s compelling 4-minute “Run Warren Run” launch video, which is definitely worth watching no matter how you vote)

No one understands better than DFA members the impact of having the voice of a powerful leader in a presidential primary. That’s because we’ve done this before.

From Howard Dean to Barack Obama, DFA members have supported transformational leaders — against the odds — in the last two multi-candidate presidential primary races. And, in both cases, this support changed politics in America for the better. Forever.

As a Senator, Elizabeth Warren is forcing the Democratic Party to take on income inequality. As a presidential candidate, she could make the fight against income inequality a critical part of the 2016 platform — no matter who wins the nomination. And, as President, no one else would be better prepared to rally the nation to fix the income inequality crisis than Elizabeth Warren.

That’s why the Democratic Party — and the American people — need Sen. Warren’s voice in the 2016 presidential campaign.

As you probably know, Elizabeth Warren has previously said that she “is not” (phrased in the present tense) running for President. But, in a People magazine interview in October, Sen. Warren opened some “amazing doors” — providing a subtly encouraging answer in response to a question about whether or not she should jump in the race:

“If there’s any lesson I’ve learned in the last five years, it’s don’t be so sure about what lies ahead. There are amazing doors that could open.”

Until Sen. Warren definitively declares in a Shermanesque statement that she will not run for president, we owe it to her to build a powerful grassroots movement that maintains the possibility of a presidential run while ensuring that the fight against income inequality will be front and center in the 2016 presidential debate.

Do you agree? Please tell us now. Deadline: Tuesday, December 16, at 10am ET. 

YES, DFA should draft Elizabeth Warren to run for president. 

NO, DFA should not draft her.

(Both voting links above include MoveOn’s compelling 4-minute “Run Warren Run” launch video, which is definitely worth watching no matter how you vote)

If we take this step, with your approval, our campaign to draft Warren won’t focus only on the presidential race. Why? Because a real grassroots movement starts from the bottom up.

We’ll draft and support the next generation of Elizabeth Warren candidates at all levels of office in all 50 states. We’ll build a broad coalition of candidates for Senate, U.S. House, state and local office who will stand with Warren in the fight against income inequality. We’ll train the campaign staff and grassroots activists who can help Warren Wing candidates achieve victory nationwide.

As DFA members told us time and again in response to our 2016 Presidential Pulse Poll in November, this isn’t just about who will be our next president. It’s about the future of our country.

But first, it’s about you and DFA. Tell us — should we do this together?

YES, DFA should draft Elizabeth Warren to run for president. 

NO, DFA should not draft her.

Thank you for sharing your thoughts.

– Charles

Charles Chamberlain, Executive Director
Democracy for America

WE MUST PROTECT SOCIAL SECURITY

Dear Ralph,

We’ve lost our Senate majority, which means that when the new Congress is sworn in, it will be more important than ever that we fight to protect time-tested programs like Social Security.

I’m particularly concerned with the statements from some of the incoming new Senators. They’re signaling a willingness to privatize Social Security and turn seniors’ retirements over to Wall Street. We can’t let that happen.

Congress needs to expand Social Security, not privatize it or cut earned benefits for seniors or the disabled. Sign this petition and show your support.

More than 59 million Americans depend on the guaranteed benefits provided by Social Security. 90% of seniors receive Social Security checks, and most seniors depend on Social Security for at least half their monthly income.

When you’re a retired senior living on a fixed income, when you’re disabled, or the family breadwinner dies, you can’t afford to have Washington play political games with your financial future. But Social Security isn’t just about retirement — it’s about providing a basic standard of living for people who work hard and play by the rules.

Tell the next Congress to protect and expand Social Security — add your voice to mine and sign the petition now.

Thank you.

Sherrod

 

Letter from Truthout…its the truth

t
 

t r u t h o u t

Fancy a blast of electromagnetic radiation? The US Navy has plans to fly at least 2,900 “training exercises” up to 16 hours per day for 260 days over national parklands and forest in the Pacific Northwest. Their plan is to blast electromagnetic radiation at stations they position in these public “protected” lands as part of their electromagnetic warfare training against, most likely, Russia and China.

It doesn’t matter that electromagnetic radiation at the levels they will use is already known to cause miscarriage, breast cancer, brain tumors and cardiovascular problems in humans, or that it will scramble the bio-navigation abilities of over one billion birds using that area as part of their migration. The Navy has already said the war games will cause “no significant impact” on humans or animals, so apparently that’s that.

Yet there is resistance. An in-depth article I wrote for Truthout about the Navy’s planned war games is now being used by thousands of people who are outraged by the plans and aim to stop them. Possible lawsuits are being investigated and the Navy might not get its way after all. The expanse of US militarism can be halted by people just like you – with the help of the information Truthout provides.

In turn, though, we need your help – we’re dedicated to bringing you the information you need, but we can’t do it without your support. Will you join the readers who fund my work and the other vital independent journalism published at Truthout? Make a tax-deductible donation today!

Colorado State University provides new findings on controversial racehorse drug

Information from  Jeff.Dodge@colostate.edu

Having trouble viewing this e-mail? View it in your browserManage your subscription.
Header - Please enable images in your e-mail program
For Immediate Release
Wednesday, October 29, 2014

Contact for Reporters:
Jeff Dodge
Jeff.Dodge@colostate.edu

Colorado State University provides new findings on controversial racehorse drug

Note to Reporters: A photo of Dr. Paul Morley is available with this news release online atwww.news.colostate.edu.

FORT COLLINS – As the debate over the controversial drug Lasix heats up in advance of the Breeders’ Cup this week, a Colorado State University researcher has released new study results about the impact that bleeding in the lungs has on racehorses’ performance and the effectiveness of the most common treatment for the condition.

Lasix, the original brand name for a diuretic called furosemide, is used by horse owners to reduce exercise-induced pulmonary hemorrhaging (EIPH), the bleeding in the lungs that commonly occurs while horses are racing.

The use of the medication was banned by the Breeders’ Cup last year in races that were limited to 2-year-old horses, but race officials reversed that policy and are allowing Lasix to be used in all races this year. The industry in North America is divided over the issue, with proponents of the diuretic arguing that Lasix protects horses’ health and improves performance, and opponents saying that permitting the drug is marring the sport’s good name.

The Breeders’ Cup, a 30-year-old series of Thoroughbred races, will be held Oct. 31-Nov. 1 at Santa Anita Park in Arcadia, Calif.

Recent research by Paul Morley, a CSU professor in the Department of Clinical Sciences and one of the foremost experts on Lasix and EIPH, is providing important new information to stakeholders in the debate. Morley is part of a long-standing collaborative group that has published three new papers in Equine Veterinary Journal that address the effects of EIPH on performance as well as the efficacy of Lasix in controlling the condition.

In the first study, Morley and his co-authors studied EIPH in 1,000 racehorses, and showed that the condition has detrimental effects on their ability to perform as elite athletes. However, in another study that followed the lifetime racing careers of more than 700 horses, the research group was unable to find an association between EIPH and the number of races the horses were able to run or their earning potential, except in the most extreme form of the condition. In the third project, Morley and his research team examined existing studies on Lasix and concluded that there is high-quality, albeit limited, evidence that Lasix is effective in reducing the incidence and severity of EIPH in racehorses. The finding supports the results of his team’s landmark 2009 clinical trial on Lasix.

“Dr. Morley is very highly regarded worldwide,” said Dr. Thomas Tobin of the Gluck Equine Research Center at the University of Kentucky. “Everything he does carries significant weight because of the longtime recognition of his research and the quality of his work.”

“These studies build on our earlier work to provide horsemen and regulators with the evidence they need to inform the highly charged debate about EIPH and Lasix,” added Ken Hinchcliff, dean of the Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences at the University of Melbourne, Australia, and one of Morley’s longtime collaborators on the studies. “Our international team has explicitly addressed the key issues facing racing around the management of EIPH.”

Despite the controversy surrounding the issue, Morley said he and his fellow researchers don’t have a horse in the race, so to speak; they are simply trying to provide independent, unbiased information so that ongoing discussions about Lasix are based on sound facts.

Morley acknowledged that there is much more research to be done, since the long-term effects of EIPH and Lasix on the wellbeing of horses are still unclear.

“We want to continue providing high-quality evidence for the decision-makers, to inform the debate,” he said.